Skip to main content
Committee on Publication Ethics: COPE
  • Sign in

Search form

Main menu

  • Home
  • About COPE
  • Resources
  • Cases
  • Become a member
  • Members
  • Events
  • News & Opinion
  • Contact Us

You are here

Home Blogs Ginny Barbour's blog

Nature news coverage of image manipulation in journals

Monthly archive

  • May 2012 (2)
  • April 2012 (1)
  • March 2012 (2)
  • January 2012 (8)
  • November 2011 (3)
  • October 2011 (2)
  • September 2011 (6)
  • August 2011 (9)
  • July 2011 (8)
  • June 2011 (3)
  • April 2011 (1)
  • January 2011 (2)
  • October 2010 (3)
  • September 2010 (4)
  • August 2010 (9)
  • July 2010 (1)
  • June 2010 (5)
  • May 2010 (1)
  • April 2010 (1)
  • March 2010 (2)
  • February 2010 (6)
  • December 2009 (1)
  • November 2009 (5)
  • October 2009 (6)
  • September 2009 (2)
  • August 2009 (2)
  • July 2009 (4)
  • June 2009 (4)
  • May 2009 (7)
  • April 2009 (2)
  • March 2009 (4)
  • February 2009 (3)
  • January 2009 (5)
  • December 2008 (3)
  • November 2008 (2)
  • October 2008 (2)

Recent blog posts

  • Nature Editorial on Publishing Risky Research
  • New declaration on Publication Ethics in China
  • New York Times reports on the sharp rise in retractions
  • Anesthesia and Analgesia publish editorial re: Fujii Statement of Concern
  • New study published on retractions in biomedical papers
  • Video misconduct evidence from Japanese whistleblower
  • Brits are getting less honest
  • Supervisor criticised for student who plagiarised
  • Editor sacked after papers are retracted
  • Prevalence of plagiarism and use of text-matching software

12/10/2009 11.53am by Ginny Barbour

The story, by Natasha Gilbert, includes statistics on screening for image manipulation at two PLoS journals, and also data from the US Office of Research Integrity.

  • Tweet
  • Linkedin
  • Tweet
  • COPE on Facebook
  • COPE on Twitter
  • Privacy Policy
  • Website Terms and Conditions